Death of the Author

Keith Haring and William S Burroughs, “APOCALYPSE” Plate two (image source)


The "Death of the Author" by Roland Barthes is a concept that hinges on the idea that nothing is original. Barthes believed that the magic happened with the reader and his/her/their experience. His essay is mostly a critique on classical criticism. He believed that critics had an obsessive focus on the author and his/her/their biography rather than the analysis of the text.  He talks about Mallarme and his theory that the author is nothing more than a medium through which language speaks. Barthes further describes text as a “multidimensional space in which a variety of writings, none of them original, blend and clash.” Again, this is the idea that texts are merely an amalgamation of words that already exist. He believed that all writing was a regurgitation of something that came before therefore "Authorship" was not important.  While this theory may seem a little depressing and somewhat nihilistic, an entire art movement was built off of this type of ideology. (1)


Philosophically the Postmodernists believed that nothing was original therefore there was a need to reuse and re-contextualize that which already existed. Much like Barthes' idea that there was no new texts. It was an art movement made up of artists who were reacting to the Modernists ideologies and the strict structural bounds to which they were tied. They were rebelling against authority and not only blurring the lines between low and high art, but actually intermixing the two together. They were really good at appropriation and challenging perceptions. Postmodern artists used a variety of techniques in their rebellion from fragmentation and discontinuity to the aforementioned appropriation. They could make something seem original by either piecing together old ideas into new or by recontextualizing things that were borrowed. Sherry Levine took it so far as taking pictures of other pictures and calling them her own while others like Marcel Duchamp employed pastiche, or the imitation of another’s style. Sherry Levine claimed to be changing the narrative from a male perspective to a feminine one. Duchamp was playing with parody. They were toying with the idea and meaning of authorship just as Barthes renounced the importance of authorship.(2)


Postmodern literary artists were doing much the same thing by using parody and fragmentation in their texts. William S Burroughs was a beat generation writer who used his famous “cut up” method to tell his stories. His "cut ups" were just what it sounds like, cutting up the text then piecing it back together randomly. I remember the first time I attempted to read the Naked Lunch I thought everyone was crazy because it made no sense to me. I couldn’t figure out why It was a critically acclaimed novel that the whole world seemed to rave about. I almost laid it aside forever, but someone convinced me to keep going. It paid off. The cut ups fell into place and I finally understood what everyone was on about. I had never experienced literature like this before, and it felt like I had just read a masterpiece. I know it is hard to imagine, but it was almost like I was experiencing the act of creation while I was reading the novel. I finally understood the brilliance of this form. Burroughs understood that the text was what was important and that no matter how it was cut up and pieced back together the reader would make sense of it. It’s almost like Burroughs had read Barthes' essay right before he started the Naked Lunch and put his theory to test. I wonder if the Naked Lunch would be as important without knowledge of Burroughs? Doesn't it matter that he invented the method? The painting I added is a collaboration of William S Burroughs and Keith Haring. They have appropriated and duplicated the Mona Lisa by DaVinci and drawn a whole bunch of phallic graffiti all over it (is this parody?). I know they were doing a project that spoke on the AIDS epidemic so maybe it is. 


I don’t want to believe that there is no originality left in the world. We are all made up of totally unique experiences, and I believe that magic can come from that. In the words of William S Burroughs, “[t]he artist aims for a miracle.”(3)


William S. Burroughs and Keith Haring, Lawrence, Kansas 1987 (Photograph Kate Simon) (image source).


Sources
  1. Roland Barthes, “The Death of the Author,” 1967.
  2. Gemmel, Mallory, “Postmodernism, The Pictures Generation, and Feminist Critique,” in Artshelp.net, accessed October 14, 2021, https://www.artshelp.net/art-theory-series-appropriation-part-two/.
  3. Keith Haring and William S Burroughs: Apocalypse, in Pace Prints, accessed October 14, 2021, https://paceprints.com/2020/keith-haring-william-s-burroughs-apocalypse#.

Comments

  1. Ashley, you explained this week's reading with amazing detail! I also love the artwork you chose to include. Kieth Haring is one of my favorites! The information you chose to include on postmodernism was especially insightful, I always enjoy bits of extra information included in these blogs. The "cut up" writing also sounds extremely interesting as well! This is very well done, I cannot think of anything you should improve on! A question for you would be, do you agree with Barthes that "The birth of the reader must be at the cost of the death of the author."?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok I am super frustrated because this makes four tries at this. I have now been replying to your comment for over an hour. It keeps giving me an error. AGHHHHHHHHHHHHH! Cookies have been cleared so....

      I always think of you when I see a Keith Haring piece. He is wonderful so it's a good thing. If you love to read then William S Burroughs is worth your time. I however, am slow, and it took me quite a few tries before it clicked. BUT I didn't know what was going on. This is an example of how having context is a good thing.

      I love viewing art without context because I find it to be more immersive that way. I don't necessarily agree that the death of the author is necessary to birth the reader. I think that sometimes context and original intent are important. The artwork I chose for example, has a much richer meaning that my explanation of Mona Lisa with some phallic graffiti. It was a piece that was part of an exhibition bringing awareness to the AIDS epidemic. Knowing that Keith Haring and William S Burroughs were the "authors" adds more context to the work.

      Delete
  2. You make interesting points regarding originality, Death of the Author can feel like a nihilistic approach, but it also seems like a more modern idea. Have you been able to find something that started a genre or became synonymous with one? Do you think that new types of stories can be created in our modern age?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure that I understand your question, but the example I used of William S Burroughs "cut ups" should work here. He started the genre of cut ups in literature and his name is synonymous with that style.

      I do think that new types of stories can be created in our age. I think my own personal biography is a new story that no one else could create. I think that to say that I have read the alphabet therefore I know all the words that could ever be is an equivalent to Barthes theory, and that's complete nonsense.

      Delete
  3. Hi Ashley,

    I enjoyed reading your blog. I especially liked the extra information on Post Modernist literature. I appreciate how you described your experience reading the Naked Lunch - I love how you depict it as an act of "reading creation." I love the beat writers Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg - I've never read Burroughs although I've seen the movies - I should probably read the books.

    One suggestion: I found this sentence confusing: "Postmodern artists used a variety of techniques in their rebellion from fragmentation and discontinuity to the aforementioned appropriation." Are you saying that their techniques are fragmentation and discontinuity, or are they rebelling against fragmentation and discontinuity? You might need a comma in that sentence. I tend to overuse them so I might be wrong. But I think if you're describing the technique you need a comma after rebellion.

    Have you ever read Ginsberg or Kerouac? I read On the Road when I was living in my van and traveling west, it was amazing. And one of my painting professors was super into Allen Ginsberg and introduced us to his poetry. If you're unfamiliar, you should check them out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi, Meg. Oh my gosh I could go on for days about the Beat Generation. I'll spare you, but as a Grateful Dead enthusiast this could turn into a 400 page essay. I love how delving into the counter culture leads to many doors that lead into many doors...

    You are probably right about my sentence needing better punctuation. I really need to visit the writing room. My biggest complaint from people is clarity. When I'm writing I get lost in my own head, and it makes perfect sense to me. There's also a time constraint so sometimes I get rushed and miss things. I will fix that during my rewrite. I appreciate the constructive criticism.

    I used to live in Lawrence, KS where William S Burroughs resided. He was a wonderful fixture to have in town (it was small like Pueblo). His voice is one of the most wonderful things about him. He was sort of a devious pervert though, and his subject matter reflects that. Jack Cassidy, the real life main character of On the Road, is one of the most fascinating people because he was a crazy speed freak who got famous by just driving the Further bus. He's this guy who had all these songs and books written about him, but he never really did anything but drive the bus and take a lot of drugs.

    You're fortunate to have had the experience of living in a van and traveling while studying art. It sounds marvelous!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Difference

Positive Images

No Great Women Artists